SSBG

A worldview is a set of claims that purport to be based on ultimate reality.

Disinterring a Dead Horse, and Beating It Some More

Posted by ssbg on January 18, 2006

  From: http://www.powerlineblog.com/                                                                  0uranium.jpg

 

The New York Times continued its obfuscation on the Niger/uranium issue this morning. The latest article is based on the declassification of a State Department memo written in 2002 that concluded, on the basis of logistical factors, that it was unlikely that Iraq could successfully obtain uranium from Niger.

As it has on various occasions in the past, the Times pretends that this somehow contradicts the famous sixteen words in President Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address, to the effect that the British had reported that Saddam tried to buy uranium in Africa. It doesn’t, of course, and we have been over this ground so many times that it is disheartening to have to plow it again.

It seems clear that, in fact, Saddam did try to buy uranium from Niger. That’s what Joe Wilson reported to the CIA when he returned from his famous mint-tea-sipping excursion there. And, as we pointed out a long time ago, there really wasn’t any plausible purpose to an Iraqi trade mission to Niger, which we know took place, other than to try to buy uranium. This is no doubt one of the reasons why the intelligence agencies’ Consensus Intelligence Estimate of October 2002 concluded that Iraq had been “vigorously trying to procure uranium ore and yellowcake.”

So, there really isn’t any doubt about the facts: Iraq tried to buy uranium in Africa, but didn’t succeed. For the Times to pretend that the fact that it would have been difficult for Iraq to successfully obtain uranium from Niger contradicts the fact that it nevertheless tried, is ridiculous. And just about anyone should be able to understand that the fact that Saddam tried to obtain uranium, albeit unsuccessfully, was itself of great importance, since it indicated an intention to re-start his nuclear weapons program.

These points are so obvious, frankly, that it is difficult to understand how a newspaper reporter, operating in good faith, could confuse them.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: